H.G. Wells, who was a socialist, wrote The Invisible Man, which was published in 1897. In this revealing clip from the 1933 film, the invisible man says: “An invisible man can rule the world, no one will see him come and no one will see him go …”
Here is the film clip:
Before 2004, most Americans had never heard of “Barack Obama, II.” He materialized, somehow, out of thin air to deliver the keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, and then, only three years later, in 2007, was a candidate for President of the United States.
“Barack Obama, II,” a man who had no record and no past other than what was published in his book Dreams from My Father, portrayed himself as an African-American JFK., who would be the first post-racial, and most-transparent president America had been waiting and hoping for.
The operant word is “portrayed,” for as most Americans have learned since then, Obama has shown himself to be the least transparent and most divisive “president” in American history. More chilling is that since his ascendency to the presidency on January 20th, 2009, he and his rogue administration have done everything in their power to undermine, sabotage, and destroy The United States of America.
But the frightening reality that is just now becoming apparent not only to Americans but to people worldwide, is that Obama‟s rise to the White House is the result of a scrupulously planned and brilliantly executed coup d’état!
No one is as duplicitous, as dissembling, or as dangerous as a man whose very existence depends on treachery and deceit.
Who is Barack Obama, II?
The irrefutably shocking answer is that he is the invisible man! Invisible in terms of his entire background and eligibility for the office of POTUS, and invisible in terms of even one objective record of his existence – here is the short list:
• A “vault” (authentic) copy of Obama‟s birth certificate: not released in spite of many lawsuits.
• Certificate of Live Birth: released but proven counterfeit (www.ObamaFiles.com) .
• Soetoro adoption records
• Punahou School records (in Hawaii)
• The Obama-Dunham marriage license
• The Soetoro-Dunham marriage license
• The Indonesian Soetoro adoption records
• Certificate of Citizenship
• Selective Service Registration, which has reported to be falsified.
• Passport from Pakistan
• Passport from Indonesia
• College records from Occidental College in CA, Columbia University in NY, and Harvard Law School in MA
• Harvard Law Review articles: None.
• Baptism certificate: None.
• Medical records
• Illinois State Senate records
• Illinois State Senate schedule
• Law practice client list
• University of Chicago Records
• University of Chicago scholarly articles
• Baptism certificate
• University of Chicago scholarly articles
Millions upon millions of words have been written to try to explain or even justify the appearance on the American scene of a POTUS lacking in credentials, experience, judgment, seriousness, focus, or even a passable “track record,” just as an equal number of words have been expended on trying to fathom how a Chicago-based community organizer with a history of close associations with Marxists, Communists, black-liberation-theology adherents, and mob-based Chicago thugs – some of them since indicted – could possibly have risen to the highest office on earth without once evoking even a hint of curiosity about his background from the now-discredited mainstream media.
Among the most investigated and controversial aspects of Obama‟s background has been his birth certificate, with countless numbers of Constitutional scholars, forensic document experts, experienced lawyers, and highly sophisticated everyday Americans, insisting that all the birth certificates the Obama regime has released – which they claim prove he was born in the United States – have been blatant forgeries.
Why does Obama have such a problem producing a simple, authentic birth certificate? Why did he spend close to two million dollars in lawyer‟s fees to keep his original birth certificate hidden?
• Is it because, as his alleged African grandmother has long insisted, Obama was born in Kenya?
• Is it because he was born in Indonesia?
• Or is Obama simply hiding the truth about who his parents really were?
Just weeks ago, a researcher and blogger from Vermont named Martha Trowbridge released must-read information (http://www.terribletruth.wordpress.com/) that has set the entire birth-certificate/eligibility issue on fire. According to Ms. Trowbridge:
• Obama is the son of the American-born, black revolutionary Muslim leader Malcolm X and his American-born and white, possibly Jewish, teenage girlfriend from the Bronx, New York, Miss Jo Ann Newman.
• Obama‟s actual name is Bari Malik Shabazz.
• Obama‟s birthday is not August 4, 1961 but rather October 28, 1959. In other words, he is not 50, as he claims, but 52.
And in a poignant and heart-tugging follow-up piece posted on November 26, 2011, Trowbridge informs her readers that contrary to what Americans were told by Obama, Jo Ann Newman, his real mother, is alive and well and has been working all these years for the social causes that she and Malcolm X shared in order to bring about an “an America in which African Americans share generously in all the opportunities and rewards America has to offer.” See for yourself: http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/. Martha Trowbridge is a credible, well-respected, and extraordinary researcher, who wouldn‟t make frivolous claims and should be taken seriously. So far, Ms. Trowbridge‟s information provides the only scenario that makes any sense!
If she is alive, as Martha Trowbridge claims she is, Miss Newman would be now between the ages of 68 and 70 years old, and it appears that at some time in the near future Ms. Trowbridge will make Miss Newman‟s identity known.
Of course, the entire Trowbridge “saga” may be a “false flag,” in that it may be yet another diversionary tactic to keep Obama‟s opponents busy while he and his minions continue their relentless crusade to fulfill Malcolm X‟s mission, i.e., to destroy capitalism, free markets, the middle class, and the military – all of which they see as impediments to the cradle-to-grave government control to which all good Communists aspire.
Just as plausible, however, is the possibility that the ongoing lawsuits and civil actions to keep Obama off the 2012 ballot threaten to derail his reelection campaign. In order to counteract these potentially game-changing obstacles, the Obama camp may be planning to “out” Barack Obama by revealing:
1. That as a son of two American citizens, he is a natural born citizen and fully qualified to hold the office of POTUS
2. That his real father was Malcolm X
3. That his real mother was, and is, Jo Ann Newman, who he will conveniently resurrect from the grave. Particularly significant, though, is that the name “Newman” is generally considered to be a Jewish name, so can we infer that his mother, Jo Ann Newman, was Jewish? If so, that would make Bari Malik Shabazz a Jew according to Jewish law. Could that be why his real mother‟s existence was covered up with the fabricated and faux Christian, “Stanley Ann Dunham?”
The standard fable of Obama‟s history is that he was the product of a brief love affair between a teenage Stanley Ann Dunham, who was living with her parents in Hawaii and attending the University of Hawaii, and a Kenyan student in his early twenties, Barack Obama.
There are relatively few photos – many, if not all of which have been proven to have been manipulated – from which we are expected to believe the myth that Stanley Ann Dunham was “Obama’s” mother, and Kenyan-born Barack Hussein Obama “Sr.,” was his father.
There are no biographies of Obama, except the mostly fictional “autobiographical” account, Dreams from My Father, which author Jack Cashill has proven in his book, Deconstructing Obama, was largely written by former domestic terrorist and personal friend of Obama, William Ayers, and not Barack Obama.
So, in short, this fraudulent and concocted history became the “truth.”
Many of the claims in Dreams have been, over the past three years, independently proven to be false, and with no corroborating evidence. Consequently, there is no true, verified and seamless history of this man, and no real record of his past until he walked into the White House in January, 2009 — from which point the efforts to reveal his past have been met with uniform resistance, expensive legal tactics, blanket media blackouts, and unanimous stonewalling from all members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat. Clearly, the American people have witnessed a conspiracy and cover-up of monumental proportions!
Most deeply entrenched in this conspiracy are the so-called mainstream media. Whether they were influenced by intimidation, threats, blackmail, or bribery, or if they simply agreed with Obama‟s leftist vision, the media have both blocked any questions about Obama‟s identity or purposefully concealed it.
CIA director William Colby once said the CIA owns anyone of any significance in the media. The spy agency has certainly have been trying to manipulate the media for the past 70 years or so, at the least. They literally created Operation Mockingbird for that very purpose: http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmockingbird.htm
The media cover-up is demonstrated quite dramatically when you consider that after almost three years into Obama’s “presidency” there are strangely few legitimate biographies about him, his life, and family: In fact, there is almost nothing! Look at the titles on Amazon, [in below URL], under Barack Obama, biography. Considering that Obama is “the first African American” president, why are there almost no biographies about him?
Yet despite the media’s best efforts to cover for Obama – to withhold the compelling connection between him and Malcolm X – it seems that the entire U.S. Congress, the Supreme Court, and lower courts throughout the country, know of this connection. No matter which elected official from the Congress or Senate is questioned about this Invisible Man, the responses are almost identical, not only in their phrasing, but in their blanket “I don‟t know nothing” attitude.
This feigned ignorance can only be speculated about. Do they think race riots would ensue if Obama was outed as the son of the admittedly anti-American Malcolm X? Have they taken political correctness to its most preposterous limits? Or are they all taking part in this grand conspiracy because they know that Barack Obama really was made in the USA?
Malcolm X believed in the Machiavellian and Marxist “the ends justifies the means” dogma that he translated into his iconic phrase “by any means necessary.” Would he have chosen his son – the only boy; he had six daughters with Betty Shabazz – to achieve the unthinkable, i.e., the overthrow of the United States government [and the West] by hiding Bari Shabazz‟s identity from birth, with the ultimate plan being to spring him on an unwitting United States 50 or so years later? Was this what Malcolm X had in mind when he gave his famous “Ballot or the Bullet” speech, in which he stated:
“… when white people are evenly divided, and black people have a bloc of votes of their own, it is left up to them to determine who’s going to sit in the White House and who’s going to be in the dog house.”
Here is the speech:
In 1955, Malcolm X was invited by President Sukarno of Indonesia to attend the Bandung Conference in Bandung, Indonesia. Why was he invited? The attendees were members of the non-aligned movement opposed to the U.S. and the Soviet Union and no white people were invited or allowed to attend. In attending, Malcolm X, who was not a U.S. government official, but simply a U.S. citizen, was violating the Logan Act.
• Did President Sukarno invite Malcolm X in order to advise him on how to orchestrate the overthrow of the United States?
• Did he plant in Malcolm X the idea to have an illegitimate son who would work his way through the American political system all the way to the White House – from the inside, incognito, while betraying no connection to his father, the anti-American and anti-white Malcolm X – in order to overthrow the United States government?
By 1960, Malcolm X had become internationally recognized as the leader of the Muslim movement in the United States. In December 1960, two months after the September meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, at which time Malcolm X had met Fidel Castro at the Hotel Theresa in Harlem, and likely also Nikita Khrushchev,
“The U.S. revolution is starting in Harlem and expresses admiration for Lenin and Stalin; predicts that Africans will be free with the assistance of the Russian army.”
[Note: Malcolm X's offices were in the Hotel Theresa and he was instrumental in getting the accommodations for Castro and his entourage at the hotel. In December, 1960, "Bari Malik Shabazz" would have been 14 months old, and Malcolm, by that time, may have already planned out his son's future.]
“The Cuban delegation at the UN asks the Security Council to stop US aggression in that country, providing a list of more than 20 incidents including bombings. The Cubans are asked to leave their downtown hotel and are offered free accommodations at Hotel Theresa in Harlem. Castro is visited there by Malcolm X, Gamal Abdul Nasser and Nikita Khrushchev….”
According to the NY Times : “In the Theresa suite early today Dr. Castro received a group of Negro reporters and a leader of the so-called Muslim movement among United States Negroes, who calls himself Malcolm X.”
Four years later, in April 1964, Malcolm X met in Jedda, Saudi Arabia, with then Crown Prince Faisal.
Twenty-four years later, in 1988, Malcolm X‟s lawyer and former Manhattan Borough President, Percy Sutton, was asked by Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, the principle adviser to one of the world’s richest men, a Saudi, to write a letter to Harvard recommending Obama. Mansour, it seems, paid Obama‟s tuition. Here is the reference: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/12/percy_sutton_dies_his_obama_re.html
Attorney Stephen Pidgeon states in his book, The Obama Error, that there is reason to believe that Obama actually attended The Patrice Lumumba School in Moscow, Russia, sometime in the period between 1988 and 1989, which would have been prior to his admission to Harvard Law School. This school, according to Pidgeon, was “a boarding school for recruits being trained in the techniques of communist overthrow.”
Attorney Pidgeon believes that Obama‟s degree from Columbia University was actually purchased from Columbia and that he never actually attended the university, and he cites the fact that absolutely no one at Columbia remembers Obama at all. He believes Obama received credits based on life-experience or education elsewhere.
Pidgeon’s book contains a clipping from a Russian newspaper that mentions a man named Obama who was studying at the Patrice Lumumba School. Where Obama actually was from 1981-1990 is shrouded in mystery, according to Mr. Pidgeon. Here Pidgeon explains his finding.
He also points out that Barack Obama gave his presidential acceptance speech in Denver, Colorado, on a stage that was a replica of the Pergamon Altar, which has historical links to Hitler and the Nazi Party:
Must see this link for complete connection of the Pergamon Altar to the NAZI party:
Unlike at Columbia, there were people who knew Obama in Russia. The following article leaves nothing to the imagination.
During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid-1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.
V. was a level-headed scientist while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause – a cause she obviously was not abandoning.
One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.‟s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.
As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge – one her husband tried to quietly rein in. The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:
“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven‟t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn‟t do it.”
The general response went something along the lines that you don‟t vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don‟t vote for vice-president, but the president and vice-president as a ticket.
“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon.”
The consensus we expressed was that we didn‟t think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she black or not.
“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?”
The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, “Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”
It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don‟t know.”
“Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call “Ivy League“. You don‟t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That‟s right, a chocolate baby! And he‟s going to be your President.”
She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly – as though all were foregone conclusions. “It‟s all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won‟t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He‟s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”
We sat there not knowing what to say. She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: they would give us a black president and he‟d be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.
She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.
She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”
At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn‟t understand what the point was and don‟t recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.
Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: “If I remember correctly, „Barack‟ comes from the Arabic word for „Blessing.‟ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She replied quickly, “Yes. It is „African„”, she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”
She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism and Barack was going to pave the way.
So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?
Well, it‟s definitely anecdotal. It doesn‟t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.
Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.
Here is a four-part interview with Tom Fife: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJty-It1cS0
In a trip to Russia, as “President” of the United States, Obama was photographed placing his hand over his heart when the Russian anthem was being played, but as we know, he didn’t place his hand over his heart during the playing of the American national anthem.
By the time Obama began to attend Harvard Law School, he was no longer calling himself or being called Barry or Bari, but rather the more austere and formal Barack Obama.
Here Obama is featured on TBS‟s Black History Minute in 1991:
Apparently his handlers gave him a full two years to become comfortable with his new identity.
According to Martha Trowbridge, it wasn‟t until 1993 that Bari Malik Shabazz “died” or “was made to die,” at the age of 32.
Here is the record of his death:
It appears that Bari Malik Shabazz conveniently “died” so that Barack Hussein
Obama could be fabricated.
Coincidentally, the following trailer appeared in October of 1993:
Becoming Barack: Evolution of a Leader (Trailer) 10/93
Here is an article about the above interview:
On Oct. 27, 1993, a 32-year-old Chicago lawyer, Barack Obama, was interviewed by an aspiring filmmaker who wanted to make a documentary about African-American role models. That movie never got made, but the 12-minute interview is just now surfacing in a video, “Becoming Barack: Evolution of a Leader.” The most telling clip is Obama talking in 1993 about his political future.
“My general view about politics and running for office is that if you end up being fortunate enough to have the opportunity to serve, it is because you got a track record of service in the community and I think right now, I am still building up that track record and if it, a point comes where I think that I might do more good in a political office” than somewhere else, “I might think about it, but that time is certainly in the future.”
Less than two years later, Obama would launch his political career with successful bids for the Illinois State Senate, the U.S. Senate, and the White House.
Just two years later, in 1995, Obama was singing the praises of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, calling the racist, anti-American, anti-Semitic preacher “a wonderful man.”
Are Bari Malik Shabazz and Barry Soetoro living side by side in the White House, deceiving the U.S. and the rest of the world? It would certainly not be the first time that a world leader depended on a “body double.” Iraq‟s late dictator, Saddam Hussein, in fact had numerous body doubles.
Giving more credence to the notion that there may be two Barrys is the fact that those who planned and plotted the biggest coup d‟état in the history of the world – the plan to overthrow the U.S. without a bullet being fired – most likely would not have relied solely on one person to actualize their plans. If Bari Malik Shabazz had been killed instead of injured in the 1982 car crash in Hawaii, Indonesian Barry would have still been able to fulfill the plot‟s central role.
According to findings posted by Attorney Mario Apuzzo,a man named Bari Shabazz is placed in Hawaii on March 12th, 1982. It is a mind-boggling coincidence that out of all places in the U.S., and on the planet, a “Bari Shabazz” appears in a court in Honolulu, Hawaii!
Is the White House staff, who no doubt signed Draconian secrecy oaths, actually living with two Obamas in the White House?
Why does “college” Barry, with his flat, pointed ears, look so different than “Indonesian” Barry, with his signature purple-tinged lips and distinctly exotic appearance?
“College/Hawaiian” Barry, from the photos that exist, show that he was present in Hawaii for all of his elementary school years, despite the allegations and purported evidence that he was in Jakarta from age 6-10. Since a person cannot be in two different places at the same time, were there two different boys?
The picture below was taken November 17th, 2011, in Australia, and the other one, of Barry Soetoro [?] was taken on October 26th, 2011 in Denver, Colorado.
Again, the picture taken in Australia clearly portrays “college/Hawaiian” Barry [aka Bari Malik Shabazz?] who looks strikingly like Malcolm X, without the glasses. Note the normal semi-pointed flat ears and long face with the tapered and extended horizontal chin. The “scar” on his scalp is somewhat visible vertically on his right side.
Was this scar, above the middle of his ear, acquired in the auto accident reported by Hawaiian officials that involved Bari M. Shabazz in 1982?
In this picture, he looks like an American black male, with lips of normal coloration. His features are reminiscent of the photo of Obama as young boy in the Hawaiian elementary school, with his arm around Scott Inoue, http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=188801]. In this photo, Obama‟s eyes are distinctly Caucasian and deeply recessed into his face, with full eyebrows and obvious eyelashes.
U.S. President Barack Obama speaks to U.S. Marines and Australian troops at the RAAF Base in Darwin, November 17, 2011. At right is Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Below: Child “Barry Soetoro,” in Jakarta, with extended, round ears the alleged adopted son of Lolo Soetoro. His chin and ears resemble the grown up Barry Soetoro [?], below.
The photo below was taken on October 26th, 2011 in Denver, Colorado. He seems to have round ears, a round face, with no prominent extended chin with a split as does “college Barry” and he does have the purple tinged lips, typical of Papuan Indonesians. Here his eyes appear distinctly Asian and not deeply recessed, with almost invisible eye lashes! His eyebrows are also different and stylized! He doesn’t, from this picture, seem to have the mole near the left side of his nose as does “college” Barry, but this could easily be added to the face. Could Ann Dunham have actually been teaching Indonesian Barry Soetoro how to be American, i.e., in the areas of music, culture, etc., that Obama describes in Dreams from My Father? Were there two separate boys and are there now really two different men?
A year left: Obama running against history
President Obama speaks about managing student debt during an event at the University of Colorado at Denver on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2011. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) By Dave Boyer, The Washington Times, Thursday, November 3, 2011
Could the difference in appearance be due to “camera angle” or could it be that there really were or are two Barrys: Bari and Barry? If so, who was the father of “Barry Soetoro?”
Could he have been Michael Rockefeller, Governor Nelson Rockefeller’s son, who was allegedly killed by cannibals in Indonesia [and went missing and was presumed dead on November 17th, 1961, as Don Nicoloff has proposed in his articles? [It is interesting to note that Barack Obama was in Bali, Indonesia, on November 18, 2011, which is, coincidentally, the 50th anniversary of Michael Rockefeller's presumed death!]
Favorite Son, The Fate of Michael Rockefeller: Unlisted video: Only those with the link can see it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J1kksHiGm8
Or was “Soetoro’s” father another Indonesian? This now-famous Indonesian Barack Obama look-alike, photographer Ilham Anas, shows Barry’s resemblance to Indonesian males. Note that when “Hawaiian” Barry smiles, his top teeth fill his entire smile, [similar to Malcolm X‟s smile] while the teeth of “Indonesian” Barry are elevated and stay under his lips.
Barry even looks strikingly similar to President Sukarno of Indonesia [who was known to have had illegitimate children all over Indonesia]! And why is it that the Indonesian translation of Obama‟s book The Audacity of Hope is: Jihad: From Jakarta to the White House! http://www.youtube.com/watch?
If there really were and are two Barry’s, did Bari really go to Pakistan in 1981, as claimed, or did Barry Soetoro? Or, if “Hawaiian Barry” traveled to Pakistan, did he use Indonesian “Barry Soetoro’s” passport that was mailed to him, since they look so much alike?
But what about the “records,” skeptics may ask, referring to the mountain of evidence about Stanley Ann Dunham‟s “existence” and the role she played in Barack Obama‟s life. Clearly, records can be created (as in forged birth certificates) and pictures can be photoshopped, and entire pieces of history both fabricated and excised, as shown in the following video:
“Records” can also be inserted. All of the pictures and documents the public has been allowed to see are meant to “validate” Barry’s fictional biography. For a conspiracy of this magnitude, the powers-that-be obviously did everything to perfect their plan, and used any and all means necessary!
Ann Dunham needed to be a part of an Indonesian family in order to be able to go to Jakarta to do her “work” for the Ford Foundation, because Americans were not allowed to go to Indonesia at that time, which, coincidentally, was the revolutionary period covered in the film The Year of Living Dangerously:
Enter Lolo Soetoro and [his allegedly adopted] son, Barry Soetoro. Was the younger Soetoro actually the unexplained “Soebarkah” child mentioned by some researchers? If so, was Soebarkah aka “Barry Soetoro,” the child who “portrayed” Ann Dunham‟s son as Barry – while the real Barry, Bari Malik Shabazz, was actually attending elementary school back in Hawaii? All of the purported pictures of Barry in Jakarta definitely look like another child, and apparently many of those images have been doctored.
Was the story about Barry Soetoro, therefore, created just so that Ann Dunham could go to Jakarta, Indonesia? Did “Soebarkah/Barry Soetoro” then act as a stand-in, a substitute Barry for those years that Ann Dunham needed to be in Indonesia?
Interestingly, on November 28th, 2011, author and Obama researcher Dr. Jerome Corsi obtained a 20-page copy of the Indonesian law in 1961 that would have demanded Obama be an Indonesian citizen to attend public school. The document is in the Indonesian language and is now being translated. Was “Soebarkah/Barry Soetoro” – who was undoubtedly an Indonesian citizen by birth – the vehicle that allowed Ann Dunham to circumvent this law, by having that child pose as her son? Obviously, Hawaiian Bari, born in New York City, and an American citizen, would not have been able to enroll in any school in Indonesia, if the law applied even to adopted children.
Here is a copy of Barry Soetoro‟s Indonesian school record:
Why would Ann Dunham have left her “son” back in Hawaii while she went to Indonesia to work, while creating the illusion of being part of an Indonesian family with a “substitute” Barry as her son?
1. Indonesia‟s laws at the time prohibited an American from attending school in Indonesia, and possibly, even an American child adopted by an Indonesian father, as may be confirmed by the translation of the 1961 Indonesian laws now being investigated by Dr. Corsi.
2. Ann Dunham was grooming and educating an “Indonesian” boy for a future role in America‟s global outreach.
3. Hawaiian “Barry,” would be able to say at a future date that he had been in Indonesia for four years, as a child, while he in fact was not and use that “fictional” story later in his political future as a selling point. He could have learned the Indonesian language at Occidental College and not in Indonesia.
4. There was no reason for him to be in Indonesia at that time and most people would not bring their very young son into a country going through a revolution.
5. There is no evidence that Hawaiian Barry was in Indonesia, except the famous piece of paper called Barry Soetoro‟s school record that was taken as proof that Lolo Soetoro adopted Barry.
6. Or finally, Hawaiian “Barry” was not really her son.
Again, for the massive coup against the United States to succeed, a coup planned over five decades ago by Malcolm X and his ardent followers, two Barrys may have been factored in to the plot from the beginning.
For a plan of this magnitude to succeed – one that was never before attempted in the history of the world – a back-up “Barry” would have been needed in case anything happened to one of them, for instance, an unexpected accident like a car crash, or an illness, etc.
Would the whole plot have failed if something had happened to the “chosen one” in the 50 years since the plot‟s inception? Those behind this intricate, multi-tentacled plot left nothing to chance, including the existence of an heir and a spare!
Who is Obama‟s Father? By Heidi Gates..
Gates proposes that Obama‟s alleged grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham, and Malcolm Little – aka El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, aka Malcolm X – are actually step brothers, with their mutual biological father being Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham.
RWE Dunham was a handsome and philandering traveling salesman who lived in Kansas, just over the border from Nebraska, where the Little family lived and Malcolm Little was born. This would explain why Barry looks like Malcolm X as well as Stanley Armour Dunham.
If true, this would make Malcolm X the uncle of Ann Dunham, and would explain her family’s involvement in Barry‟s upbringing – assuming that in this scenario, Betty Shabazz or another woman, perhaps Jo Ann Newman, as Martha Trowbridge suggests, was the mother.
Here is additional information about Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham:
It is likely that Martha Trowbridge, blogger [http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/] and extraordinary researcher, has somehow uncovered Barry’s real identity, as Malcolm X’s only son, Bari Malik Shabazz, who she claims was born on October 28th, 1959, and not August 4th, 1961.
Although Betty and Malcolm could have been Bari’s real parents, it is unlikely, and it is more probable, from the evidence that Ms. Trowbridge has recently produced, that the biological mother was actually Miss Jo Ann Newman, a young white woman from the Bronx, New York, and not the alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who Martha Trowbridge has emphatically claimed never really existed!
Malcolm, therefore, certainly had the means, opportunity, and motive to achieve his dreams through his own “invisible” man – his son Bari Malik Shabazz.
Consider this possibility: Another Cold Case File, Closed: “Malcolm X’s Missing Eyeglasses”
Look here to see the broken eyeglasses that Obama was photographed wearing while sleeping, which are possibly the same broken glasses retrieved at the scene of Malcolm X‟s assassination by either Betty Shabazz or Malcolm‟s Bronx girlfriend, Jo Ann Newman:
At the time of Malcolm X’s assassination in February 1965, Stanley Ann Dunham would have been about 23 years old. Given that there seems to be no evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham ever met Malcolm X and that it was highly unlikely that she was even in New York City, Malcolm’s glasses couldn‟t have come from from Stanley Ann.
However, Betty Shabazz could have given them to Obama, or, as Martha Trowbridge maintains, his real mother, Jo Ann Newman, was the one who gave them to her son. Jo Ann, who lived nearby in the Bronx, was mentioned as being present in the first row of the audience when Malcolm was assassinated.
Or, was Stanley Ann Dunham really Jo Ann Newman, who was later given another identity and family history?
If this account is true, then it connects Malcolm X, a New Yorker, with Obama‟s real mother, Jo Ann Newman, also a New Yorker, a connection, which has up until now been a missing piece of the puzzle. Also, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one!
In a relatively new book by the late Manning Marable, Manning Marable’s ‘Reinvention’ Of Malcolm X : NPR, the author provides information that suggests that Malcolm’s relationship to Betty was tenuous. Was the motivating reason for Malcolm to marry in order to have babies, and specifically a son to fulfill his political dreams?
The couple had six daughters. Their names were Attallah, born in 1958 and named after Attila the Hun; Qubilah, born in 1960 and named after Kublai Khan; Ilyasah, born in 1962 and named after Elijah Muhammad; Gamilah Lumumba, born in 1964 and named after the assassinated Prime Minister of Congo, Patrice Lumumba; and twins, Malikah and Malaak, born in 1965 after their father’s assassination and named for him.
Barack Hussein Obama bears a striking resemblance to the first three of their six daughters, and was given a name that is consistent with those given to Malcolm’s other six children. So could “Bari Malik Shabazz” have been born in 1959 to Malcolm and Betty?
If the conception and birth dates are analyzed, Betty could have given birth to Bari Malik Shabazz in between the births of Attallah and Qubilah. Martha Trowbridge’s article places Bari Malik Shabazz, who she claims was born on October 28th, 1959, at an address in Elmhurst, Queens, which was very close to the house that Malcolm X lived in.
Could it be that their baby, Bari, was sequestered and concealed and his parentage hidden in order to achieve Malcolm’s political goals?
Was Bari’s birth an accident or planned? Was he Betty’s and Malcolm‟s own son, who they then hid away? Would Malcolm really have had his illegitimate son living one block away from Betty and his home?
Or was he Stanley Ann Dunham’s or Jo Ann Newman’s son? Where was Bari for the first few years of his life? Up until now, we had no clue! But now we see that he could have been living in Elmhurst, Queens, near his father! Was Bari, then, after Malcolm X was assassinated, sent to live in Hawaii? This would explain the fact that he was first photographed in Hawaii at about 5 years old, and would confirm a 1959 birth, and presence in Hawaii in 1965.
From 1955 to 1964, Malcolm X associated with communist world leaders including President Sukarno of Indonesia, Cuba‟s Fidel Castro, [likely] Russia‟s Nikita Kruschev, and many others who he would have met at the Bandung Conference in 1955.
The FBI files, in the public domain, confirm that the FBI was investigating Malcolm X to verify Communist influence and also Malcolm X’s violation of the Logan Act: Part 24.
Malcolm X’s trip to Egypt, in 1964, was paid for by the Egyptian government. Is it likely that his trip to the Bandung Conference, which he made with Adam Clayton Powell in 1955, was paid for by Sukarno? What was he up to? Could he have been conspiring to overthrow the U.S. government?
Is Obama now fulfilling the dreams of his father, Malcolm X?
By Another Sojourner for Truth
November 30th, 2011
Copyright © 2010 - Black Quill and Ink FAIR USE NOTICE: For all videos and anything used on this site: "Information, including content and videos, contained in this blog or on my Facebook site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit. . The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and in no way reflect the opinions or views of BQI or its management. Where controversial views are expressed they may be allowed to remain on this site as a means to gain knowledge on a particular subject matter.